Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 6,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 9:31 am
The administration told the Ninth Circuit that it "believes state secrets and national security would be put at risk if the court allows the suit to proceed," Perez wrote. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
Kaiser appealed to the Ninth Circuit both the MDL court's adjudication of its Section 2 claim and the jury verdict on its Section 1 claim.[1] Section Two Monopolization Claim. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
In its opinion, the court cited United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit now offers several RSS feeds with headlines, descriptions and links back to its website for complete information. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will overturn FERC's conditional approval of the Bradwood Landing LNG terminal project and compel the Commission to allow Oregon to complete its environmental review before issuing another decision on the project. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
The Ninth Circuit granted Shell’s and Tesoro’s separate petitions for permission to appeal the orders remanding the class actions to state court, and reversed. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
Thus, the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court had properly granted summary judgment in favor of United National. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:28 am
Feb. 10, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed that when pleading a claim for securities fraud under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”), plaintiffs are bound by prior Ninth Circuit authority that requires them to plead particularized facts giving rise to a strong inference that defendants knew, or were deliberately reckless in not… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
On appeal from an order of the district court, the Ninth Circuit held the email was protected by the marital privilege and precluded its admission in “judicial or grand jury proceedings. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
The Illinois state court action was brought by Katz, the former holder of real estate security interests (“units”), who surrendered them for cash when an impending merger gave him the choice of a cash-out or units in the new entity, neither of which allegedly provided the tax benefits of the original units. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
But a District Court obviously cannot overrule circuit law, even when a rule makes no sense, so the court was bound to apply the Ninth Circuit's Hoehne rule, so any challenge to the rule itself will have to wait until appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
Ninth Circuit Holds that Single Sale on eBay Does Not Provide Sufficient Minimum Contacts with Buyer's State. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
Army Corps of Engineers (2008) 543 F.3d 586, the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit held that the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 10:52 pm
" Id. at *6.Of Note: Judge Graber's "liberal" reading of a deficient indictment traces back to an important Ninth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:23 am
Such a non-categorical approach was recently used by the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:23 pm
In a declaratory judgment action by Cornhusker, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified the following question to the Washington Supreme Court:Does sending notice of cancellation by certified mail satisfy the “mailed” requirement of RCW 48.18.290 (1997) and give sufficient notice of cancellation to comply with RCW 48.18.290, even if there is no proof that the cancellation letter was received by the insured? [read post]
