Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
§ 2000cc et seq., to require only a minimal showing that a prison grooming rule which concededly imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise is the “least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
United States, 51 F.4th 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2022))). [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 1:39 pm
Souter read from his stare decisis portion, and O'Connor from her undue burden analysis. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
In Legacy Church v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
In order to determine whether a peremptory challenge is fair and legitimate, Maryland courts apply a three-step process established by the United States Supreme Court in the Batson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:46 pm
In a recent case, Castellanos v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:09 pm
United States 5. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:57 am
On July 23, 2009, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division issued its opinion in the case of James Liik, et al v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
The Court disagreed, ruling that “an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Secretary of State to identify and report countries whose laws prohibit adoption involving immigration to the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
District Court for the Central District of California, pursuant to 42 U.S.C., § 1983, a federal statute which provides a remedy for persons who, under color of state law, are deprived of rights, privileges or immunities granted under federal law or the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:15 am
Nike v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:53 pm
Attorney Richard Callahan's office seeks to resurrect the case of United States v. [read post]
