Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
RU 14 is not a registered trade mark in Canada. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:07 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
The Times reports, “There is no evidence that the N.S.A. has implanted its software or used its radio frequency technology inside the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:51 am
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
His position is revealed in his judgment (another masterly summary of the relevant law, it goes almost without saying) where he states:... [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
In Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down DOMA’s prohibition of the recognition of same-sex couples as married or spouses as an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
It owns three United States registrations for the trademark SWATCH. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
The employer will dole out $450,000 to resolve the interns’ wage claims, marking the second significant recovery by unpaid interns since the wage-hour litigation trend took off two years ago (Davenport v Elite Model Management Corp, January 9, 2014, Nathan, A). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States, 133 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm
The concept of ‘net neutrality’ has taken a hit in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:10 pm
We are disappointed in the decision in Golan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 77 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
