Search for: "United States v. Small"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 6,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
United States 1986 Judgment, para. 195, a minore ad maius). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
If former President Trump commingled his personal effects with classified documents belonging to the United States, then that is not a reason to allow him to restrict use of the government's property. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
The United Kingdom). , Nos 58170/13, 62322/14, 24960/15, paragraph 4).122. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
It nearly destroyed her. * United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
[v] Heinrich von Treitschke, Politics, ed. by Hans Kohn (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963 [1898]), pp. 300-301. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
Code DWD 149.03 provides: (1) Claimants and employing units. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
For an institution that likes to lecture the whole world--at times even the United States--about democracy and the rule of law, it's remarkable what the Commission's draft SEP regulation envisages. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The claim about "more mature content for more serious gaming" is something that with my games industry background (once the first person to work for Blizzard outside the United States) and my own experience playing games I have to reject: it's just not true that mature content implies or fosters serious gaming. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
In his Microsoft v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 5:00 am
United States involved a challenge to President Franklin Roosevelt’s firing in 1933 of Republican FTC Commissioner William Humphrey, based solely on policy reasons. [read post]
