Search for: "V D"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 76,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
One of the recent central themes of the Office of the Chief Accountant[1] has been that high-quality audits are foundational to the trust that underlies capital markets.[2] High-quality audits protect investors, instill shareholder confidence in the quality of the financial information, and enable public companies to raise capital efficiently.[3] The investor protection afforded by high-quality audits is as important to U.S. investors in foreign companies that participate in the U.S. capital markets… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:15 pm
See D. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 12:02 pm
The respondent in Huscoal, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Zirpoli v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
More broadly, we would be able to help: with briefs opposing sealing, with briefs opposing pseudonymity, and with briefs (usually in appellate courts) defending the decision below on any First Amendment or First-Amendment-related question, when the appellee isn't appearing (see Doe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
” State of Ohio v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:42 am
El Proyecto del Senado 635, de la autoría de la senadora Wanda Soto Tolentino, pasa ahora a la consideración de la Cámara de Representantes. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
. prices" in another state, and thus "deprive[d] businesses and consumers in other States of 'whatever competitive advantages they may possess' based on the conditions of the local market. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:57 pm
., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015) (BFI), which held an employer could be considered a joint employer as long as it exercised “indirect control” over working conditions or had “reserved authority” to do so. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 10:21 am
., S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
(Grover v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:32 am
Dunham v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
D. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:20 am
Cane Bay Partners VI LLLP (D. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
The question leads me to wonder how the controversy over loss-sharing and its impact on partner status in the Epstein case correlates to the raison d’être for LLPs, namely, the limited liability of the LLP partners codified in Section 26(b) of the Partnership Law as an exception to the rule imposing joint and several liability on general partners for the partnership’s debts and obligations. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:06 am
Dept. of the Interior (D. [read post]
