Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 6,595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
I'm back from the City (definite article "the", capital "C" -- as I grew up referring to it, notwithstanding my upstate NY-raised wife's dissenting opinion on that particularly parochial identification), after attending LegalTech ® New York 2009 earlier this week. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Although the statute did not expressly state this: 14. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
John M. [read post]
Georgia's House Study Committee on Restrictive Covenants in the Commercial Arena Issues Final Report
2 Feb 2009, 9:26 am
V(c) of the Constitution of Georgia of 1983, which reads: "The General Assembly shall not have the power to authorize any contract or agreement which may have the effect of or which is intended to have the effect of defeating or lessening competition, or encouraging a monopoly, which are hereby declared to be unlawful and void. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:39 am
Kusel, Ann M. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US Patents Congress weighs patent specialisation for federal judges (Ars Technica) (Inventive Step) (Law360) (IP Spotlight) (Patent Prospector) M Lemley & B Sampat’s report ‘Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate’ – experienced examiners allow more, cite less (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PTO problems are not new; the more things change, the more they stay the same (Inventive Step) Peer to… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
Condux v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Jones Nominal Reasonable Royalties for Patent Infringement Nathaniel C. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
Eng wrote for the panel in Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:54 am
C. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
" Dana C. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:33 am
" William M. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
State Farm Ins. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
” That problem came to a head a couple of weeks ago in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
