Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 29,301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Writing for the unanimous high court, Justice Tamika Montgomery Reeves said, “‘Whether . . . an equitable remedy exists or is applied using the correct standards is an issue of law and reviewed de novo,’ but . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
Carbado (Univ. of California, Los Angeles - Law) have posted Critical Race Theory Meets Third World Approaches to International Law (UCLA Law Review, forthcoming). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:29 am
Key Findings Introduction Consumption Taxes in Brief Consumption Tax Revenues in OECD Countries Value-added Tax Sales Taxes Excise Taxes Excise Tax Trends Conclusion Appendix (See PDF) Key Findings Consumption taxes are a significant source of revenue for governments across the world, making up 32.3 percent of tax revenues in OECD countries in 2019. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:16 am
-based Americans for Prosperity Foundation and the Thomas More Law Center filed petitions for writs of certiorari in August 2019, requesting that the Supreme Court review that decision. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
Those are worth reviewing because other courts may be equally particular. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:39 am
Just as we were getting used to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the “CCPA”), Californians voted to approve Proposition 24, the California Privacy Rights Enforcement Act of 2020 (the “CPRA”). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:51 am
This, for me, is as meaningful as any review in a mainstream publication. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am
Thus, it sets the precedent for both California state courts and federal courts ruling on California law the opinion is published (except for the last two sections, which are inconsequential). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:15 am
Sharon Dolovich (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted Mass Incarceration, Meet COVID-19 (University of Chicago Law Review Online (2020)) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
SYMPOSIUM: The California Consumer Privacy Act, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 54, 2021, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-01, Justin Hughes, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, Margot E. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 2:29 pm
All of which can be consistent with a core belief of this law firm that we can repair the planet with capitalism. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:44 am
The law courses are constructed from out a world view that centers law as the authoritative expression of social order and principles. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:46 pm
The post President Biden’s COVID-19 Rescue Plan and Executive Order On Protecting Workers appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:06 pm
The Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC law firm attorneys are investigating broker Michael Edward Magill’s alleged recommendations to invest in private placements. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:06 pm
The Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC law firm attorneys are investigating broker Michael Edward Magill’s alleged recommendations to invest in private placements. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:36 pm
Housing development projects would remain otherwise subject to local zoning, parking, design, and other ordinances and to state laws such as the Housing Accountability Act, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prevailing wage law, and other housing, environmental review and labor law requirements. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:13 pm
Upon review, the court agreed with the trustee’s latter assessment, dismissing the appeal as moot. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
California 20-808Issues: (1) Whether a court reviewing a claim under Batson v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Holding otherwise would permit state law (or, more precisely, state court rules) to dictate the applicability of federal constitutional law. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
In the California Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008), Minter prioritized the sex discrimination argument, but his co-counsel Terry Stewart believed that it would not win the case—and she was right. [read post]
