Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 48,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Retired employees over age 65, however, were required to enroll in a Medicare Part B program [Part B] and the district reimbursed retirees the cost of Part B coverage. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The new rule aims to improve access to hearing aids and to reduce the cost to consumers. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:50 am
Just this week I showed that Germany is the center of gravity of what is presently the biggest 5G patent dispute: Nokia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:36 am
A recent federal government case, Ebada v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
In M.L. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 6:50 am
MCED test market by raising costs and hindering development efforts of Grail’s rivals. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 9:30 am
Such measures might cost a bit upfront, but compared to a major slope movement/failure, a geotechnical bill to analyze improvement plans would be inconsequential. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
[Despite his criticisms of Roe, he also believed in stare decisis] I mentioned recently John Hart Ely's famous criticism of Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
"] From Doe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
On 12 October 2021, Oxford County Court handed down judgment in Fairhurst v Woodard (Case No: G00MK161). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:36 pm
Recently, in Yiyu Lin v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court decision, NCAA v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 10:40 pm
Nokia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm
From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
