Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 27,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Giannelli Case Western Reserve University – School of Law 20 J.L. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:31 pm
Aamen Madhani of USA Today reports that the city recorded 51 homicides in January of this year, compared to 29 in 2015 and 20 in 2014. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:19 am
Whether someone is home or not does not alter these inviolate precepts. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Giannelli Case Western Reserve University – School of Law 20 J.L. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
(2) If not, does petitioners' inability to seek pre-enforcement judicial review of the administrative compliance order violate their rights under the Due Process Clause? [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:06 pm
It is the intent of the General Assembly to create an Internet pilot program for the sale of lottery tickets to capture this new form of market participant. (20 ILCS 1605/7.12). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:06 pm
" (Brief, p. 20.) [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:47 am
Related posts:US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in BilskiOn Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
No one at my house says this, yet they continue to call, sometimes 20 times a week from the same vendor. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
The Canadian patent actually issued with what appears to be broader claims as compared to the U.S. patent (at least claim 1 in the Canadian case looked broader at first glance). [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am
When the Navajo Generating Station closes, where does the water go? [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
Keeney, No. 2010-SC-397 (December 20, 2012), a legal malpractice case that involved an underlying personal injury suit arising when an airplane crashed into Brenda Osborne's home. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:27 am
On February 14 the bill passed the House by a vote of 38 ayes, 21 nays, and 1 member did not vote. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:22 am
Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:57 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the trial court properly determined that (1) the state’s interests outweigh Defendant’s common-law right to bodily integrity; (2) the forcible administration of artificial nutrition and hydration to Defendant does not violate his constitutional right to free speech and privacy; and (3) international law does not prohibit medically necessary force-feeding under such circumstances. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 1:41 am
Less than half a year after the CJEU’s decision in Case C-646/20 Senatsverwaltung für Inneres (discussed here by Krzysztof Pacula), the Court had to engage again with the question of what constitutes a “judgment” in the sense of an EU instrument in Case C-291/21 Starkinvest. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
(2) or, does the applicability of Article 10 depend on whether the application of the foreign law, which is discriminatory in the abstract, also discriminates in the particular case in question? [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:34 pm
The order does not specifically address individuals appearing at the POE for in-person TN or L-1 applications. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
This does not make sense, but it’s the way it is. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:47 am
All will run from 1:00 – 5:00 p.m. [read post]