Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 5921 - 5940 of 6,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 10:30 pm
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if you are going to claim that you are a refugee due to your sexual orientation, come up with clear convincing evidence.This was not the case in SZMNV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, where the wife claimed refugee status because she was a lesbian and would therefore be persecuted in India, and the husband claimed refugee status because:of [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Section 3 of DOMA, codified at 1 U.S.C. sec. 7, provides: "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse' refers only to a person of the… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:30 pm
Late last year, the High Court decided in Kennon v Spry that a husband who tried to exclude his wife from the family trust would have to pay her over $2 million.Dr Ian Spry is a renowned expert on tax and equity. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
Cortez's wife sued the building's landlord, Delmar Realty Co., claiming the latter's failure to provide adequate security led to her husband's injuries. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:40 am
The New Jersey divorce judge was "unimpressed" with the wife's expert's testimony regarding the alleged valuation of the ex-husband's accounting practice. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
The musical interlude occurred in Alito's major ruling in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
The New Jersey divorce judge ruled that the ex-wife could buy out her ex-husband's interest in the former marital home based on its value in 1996 when the parties divorced, rather than at its value in 2003 when he demanded the sale of the home. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:40 pm by Martha New Milam
The answer to that question is something called the doctrine of necessaries.The necessaries doctrine comes from the English common law duty of a husband to provide for the necessary expenses of his wife and child. [read post]