Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 9:27 am
§ 1836(b)(3)(D). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
§ 2252(a)(4)(B). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 9:55 am
Context and perspective matter, in other words. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
But, again, I don’t [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
If these matters can’t be resolved by the Court of Appeal, then they should be referred to the relevant Rules Committees. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:41 am
Sometimes, this isn’t a bad thing. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) * As of January 2014 we measure the total amount of time spent on the pages rather than simply the number of hits; as well, a case once mentioned won’t appear again for three months [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
It's possible counties won't be able to find lawyers to take on complex cases if they may be limited to low, flat fee based on standardized schedules, no matter how many hours they put in on a case. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Appellant essentially argued County’s general plan update illegally determined all residences must be treated as “compatible uses” on timberland production zoned lands, whereas § 51104 requires County to make a case-by-case determination of compatibility based on whether a particular residence is (a) “necessary for” management of such lands, and (b) not otherwise incompatible with underlying timber operations. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 11:00 am
I represent both of them as co-administrators in this matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
Line of customers waiting to purchase cannabis at the Société québécoise du cannabis (SQDC). [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am
Judges often don’t enquire whether the agent who has taken the action is actually the landlord. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:30 pm
Hence the minutes:“...irreversibly determined the matter at stake concluding the proceedings in refusal of the subject application and adversely affecting the applicant’s divisional application.” – (point 9.B, page 12 of 22, Petitioner’s Reply)XVII. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:29 pm
Looking back at my original example (“according to Steve, Paul is a convicted felon”), let’s assume Steve doesn’t work for the government and his statement about Paul is not on a matter of public interest. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:00 pm
This list is called Schedule A/B. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:31 pm
This is especially true in the public sector, where (on the whole) privacy impact assessments have been undertaken as a matter of course for some time. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
In addition, knowledge of the mission and legal issues affecting the IC with specialized experience in (a) National Intelligence Program budget and execution; (b) basic and applied research, and the development of systems, including IT systems; and (c) artificial intelligence, machine learning and data management is strongly preferred. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
The FTC chose administrative review of this matter instead of federal court. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:31 pm
Starting in 2016, the tribunal started hearing strata property (i.e. condo) disputes, and claim claims matters in June 2017. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
In the minds of many such activists, sex work is a form of patriarchal oppression and violence against women as opposed to a private matter between consenting adults. [read post]
