Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 6,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
The US Supreme Court now held that the amount was excessive as a matter of maritime common law and reduced the award of $2.5 billion punitive damages to $500 million, invoking a 1:1 maximum limit (in maritime cases) of punitive damages to compensatory damages (here, $507 million).Justice Souter, speaking for the court, wrote what appears to be an intentionally detailed, historically-tracing and forward-looking opinion on the legal aspects of punitive damages, essentially telling us that… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
"Obviously this is not a pending matter. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
In sum, the district court properly concluded that the record did not support a case of obviousness of the '552 patent as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
Notably, the court provides in dicta "[h]ad New Line used the likeness of The Three Stooges on t-shirts which it was selling, Comedy III might have an arguable claim for trademark violation. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:12 am
" (h/t to AsiaBizBlog) The seminar will take place on August 7 from 1 pm to 2:40 pm, EST. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
In sum, the district court properly concluded that the record did not support a case of obviousness of the '552 patent as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:36 pm
The Government sets forth its evidence against Hamdan on page 3-4 (paragraphs g,h,i and j.) [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:57 pm
We therefore limit our prosecutions to ensure real individual guilt, and we resist using indictments as a means for teaching society a lesson, no matter how necessary that lesson might be. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:21 pm
(See: New York's Chief Judge Kaye Finally Brings Suit for Judicial Pay Raises)Supreme Court Justice Edward H. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:57 pm
"I came to Blank Rome from an in-house legal department at which the ability to navigate corporate politics was given a high premium...In working with you...I appreciate your input on these matters, which enabled me to best choose where to devote my limited business development resources. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Actually, I didn't have to look very far. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
AT&T Techs., Inc., 789 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1986); Silas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:11 am
While this isn't really a cybercrime case (since he wasn't facing criminal charges), it's still a case about hacking. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 7:40 am
Here's hoping that she takes that path.-- Posted by Neil H. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Why wouldn't Bank of America (say) introduce BofA Law, or H&R Block, or Charles Schwab? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
In 2002, Alan H. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:43 pm
Does he mean that the murder might reveal that the intent of the prior abuse was to intimidate the witness from testifying - and if so, what does that matter? [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:50 am
" I won't be surprised if that becomes the next, well, real thing.-- Posted by Neil H. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:01 am
(H/T Geoff Shackelford). [read post]
