Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5921 - 5940 of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim of conversion of money is proper “when funds designated for a particular purpose are used for an unauthorized purpose” (East Schodack Fire Co., Inc. v Milkewicz, 140 AD3d 1255, 1256 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:15 pm
Via the IPKat's informative friend Stephanie Bodoni (Bloomberg) comes news of the European Court of Justice hearing today in Case C-343/07 Bavaria N.V. and Bavaria Italia Srl v Bayerischer Brauerbund e.V. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Mark Rienzi maintains that at the oral argument this week in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
” Thus, a trademark owner may only seek redress if another’s use of a registered mark on a different set of goods and services is likely to cause confusion with the owner’s use of the mark in connection with its registered goods.The Ninth Circuit reiterated its holding in Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  Moreover, it is also now clear that the state has a positive obligation to protect individuals from media intrusion into their private lives. [read post]