Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 5921 - 5940 of 57,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
Food and Drug Administration The federal government’s lightning fast (by bureaucratic standards) timeline to authorize Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine lived up to its Operation Warp Speed name. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:27 am by Dennis Crouch
   The defendant pointed the district court toward the 2021 decision in TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am by Eric Goldman
“each result on Groupon’s page was clearly labeled with the service provider’s name. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 9:38 pm by Howard Friedman
., March 11, 2022), the court concluded:Texas law does not grant the state-agency executives named as defendants in this case any authority to enforce the Act’s requirements, either directly or indirectly.CNN reports on the decision. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
But you very much defended your actions, and stated clearly that you are not interested in any kind of diversity training. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:09 pm by David Kopel
[Part 1: The feckless Tibetan government fails to prepare] March 10 is Tibetan Uprising Day, commemorating the heroic Tibetan resistance against Chinese Communist imperialism. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 10:33 am by Jim Walker
” Twenty years ago, a well known and highly respected journalist named Jim DeFede, then employed by the Miami New Times, wrote a series of articles in which he asked the question “Is Mickey A Greedy Corporate Pig? [read post]
Based on these provisions, we conclude that Texas law does not grant the state-agency executives named as defendants in this case any authority to enforce the Act’s requirements, either directly or indirectly.The ruling effectively ends the federal challenge to the law. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 5:51 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Technological innovations over the past sixty years, namely the internet, make it so that today anyone can publish anything for the whole world to see. [read post]
” The Global Times asserts that this alleged disinformation is meant to discredit China due to Australia’s discomfort with the “concrete benefits” (namely, disaster relief and coronavirus aid) that China provides to neighboring countries. [read post]
” The Global Times asserts that this alleged disinformation is meant to discredit China due to Australia’s discomfort with the “concrete benefits” (namely, disaster relief and coronavirus aid) that China provides to neighboring countries. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
Accordingly, we hold that sovereign immunity does not bar the petitioners' suit against these named defendants at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:22 am by Silver Law Group
Brokers who decide to defend themselves and fight back have an uphill battle to clear their names. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mustakis sued Chattem, the maker of “Selsun Blue Naturals” anti-dandruff shampoo, alleging that its name misled consumers into believing that the shampoo contains no synthetic ingredients in violation of GBL §§ 349 & 350/leading to unjust enrichment. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 5:58 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Feb. 28, 2022), plaintiff was the brother of a patient who had died after a brief stay at defendant nursing home. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Paul Rosenzweig
There is an entire ecosystem out there with multiple layers of control and levers for influencing content—and policy makers have yet to explore how that entire ecosystem might be engaged in the process of defending against disinformation campaigns and malicious content. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:48 am by SHG
Smollett’s name had become synonymous with lying, that he had sought to throw a “national pity party” for himself and that Mr. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Dismisses Most Serious Federal Charge Against Jan. 6 Capitol Riot Defendant MSN – Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 3/8/2022 A federal judge ruled the Justice Department cannot charge January 6 defendants with obstructing Congress’s certification of President Biden’s 2020 election victory unless they tampered with official documents or records in the attack on the U.S. [read post]