Search for: "People v. David" Results 5921 - 5940 of 6,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
  Whereas modern law generally guarantees rights that are standing features in society, the law in antiquity did not affect the everyday relationships of people unless they were harmed in specific ways. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
«But according to the Javelin data, people probably worry way too much about identity theft. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
[L]ast term Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a separate opinion in a death-penalty case for the sole purpose of excoriating Justice David Souter, who had written in a dissent about exonerated innocents. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:48 am
Just why do you people have it in for Dinkins, anyway? [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
(Dave tweaks me for my nod to David Lat's librarian hottie lists. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Larry O'Dell, Associated Press Writer, Richmond, Va. wrote about a recent Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, Stroud v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Someone recently asked me what Lawrence v Texas was about. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:44 pm
" So, he kind of didn't appreciate my column.And there was a letter yesterday, by David W. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
David Lat examines a recent survey at UVA Law School and my question is -- what about Tennessee law schools? [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:39 am
If the Winkelmans lose, says Georgetown University Law Center professor David Vladeck, "it means these cases just can't be litigated -- not because they're not valid, but because they are brought by people of modest means. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
" The firm has 11 openly gay partners, one of whom is David Braff, who has publicly defended the firm from homophobic accusations. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:55 am
But if someone sees SPAM ARREST, the likelihood is that people will think there is some sponsorship or affiliation with Hormel.Spam Arrest began its argument by stating: This case presents an issue the Board has not considered. [read post]