Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 5921 - 5940 of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
 It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Padilla's captors did not solely rely on the inhumane conditions of his living arrangements to deprive him of regular sleep. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The District Court held that Rule 14a-8 mandates that the discretion it provides to companies to omit certain proposals be exercised fully and solely by the company's board. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:19 am by Sareta Ashraph
By way of example, the elements of the crime of rape as a violation of international law weren’t defined until the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s (ICTR) 1998 Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am by Roy Ginsburg
• Second, the employer may develop a “targeted screen” based on three factors articulated in a 1975 Eighth Circuit decision, Green v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
Rogovoy stated: "I never mentioned any of the people: the defendant, the witnesses. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
And those two things – asking people to believe something they can see isn’t true, and stretching the law beyond what it can reasonably incorporate to justify an end the Court wants to achieve – are troubling precedents for the functioning of the law and our legal system. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
  Business people and their counsel need to take that into consideration when planning enforcement and defense of their IP. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:08 am by Dale Carpenter
It certainly exceeds the percentage of the American people who support same-sex marriage (about 50%, depending on the poll). [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]