Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5921 - 5940 of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 6:46 pm
Defendant moved to compel the deposition of a member of Plaintiff 's trial counsel regarding Plaintiff's pre-filing investigation. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff's claimed defamation damages ... are necessarily limited exclusively to his reputation amongst the internal Church leadership.But even limiting the scope of plaintiff's tort damage claim will not save his cause of action against the defendant Church, its Pastor and Moderator. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff claimed that the Vatican's policies contributed to the abuse, and asserted negligence and vicarious liability claims against the Vatican. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Often, however, questions arise in negligence disputes when the cause of a plaintiff's injury cannot be proven. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:29 pm by Michael Atkins
Plaintiffs logo and screen shot from defendant’s Web site Just in time for summer! [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:08 pm by Michael Atkins
According to plaintiffs complaint, defendant Gary Loomis used to own plaintiff G. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:49 pm
A federal judge in Texas awarded a plaintiff's attorney a whopping $750 per hour. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:11 am by Eugene Volokh
He concluded plaintiffs lacked standing to change such a government declaration: Just because a plaintiff disagrees with the Government's actions, however, does not equate to discriminatory treatment…. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:07 am
This defendant's in hot water.The First Department denied a motion to dismiss in an action seeking damages for injuries allegedly suffered when a glass shower door fell on plaintiff at defendant's hotel, in Higgins-Barber v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 7:17 am by Docket Navigator
Plaintiffs 'contingent' formulation obfuscates the exact substance of Plaintiff's allegations and does not 'crystallize [Plaintiff's] theories of the case,' as Rule 3-1 commands. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
And the idea that the defendant considered dating the plaintiffs friend to be running an errand for the plaintiff is just totally preposterous. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm by Robert Kreisman
Ultimately, the court rejected the plaintiffs counsel’s assertion of work-product protection under Rule 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) and ordered the production of all drafts of the expert’s report and a number of communications from the plaintiffs counsel. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:58 am
They frequently seek information about claims paid so they can set off any court award by the amount the plaintiff has already obtained elsewhere. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:38 pm by David Fraser
The Court agreed that to deny the plaintiffs anonymity in the court proceeding would disclose the very information they seek to protect and exacerbate the damage and/or risk of harm that has already been caused by Health Canada’s mailing that identified them as a participant in the Program.Government lawyers, on behalf of Health Canada, argued that this was a matter related solely to marihuana use and that the plaintiffs’ privacy should not be protected. [read post]