Search for: "Reiter v Reiter"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 6,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
Mount v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:20 pm
Cavin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:26 pm
Bogue In the case of Coos County Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
Richard Wolff & Son, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
By Eric Goldman Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., No 04 Civ. 4607 (RJS) (SDNY July 14, 2008) In a 66 page ruling that I haven't had time to digest, the judge appears to have completely accepted eBay's arguments in the Tiffany v. eBay lawsuit over sales of counterfeit Tiffany goods on eBay, issuing a clean sweep for eBay and dismissing the case in its entirety. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
We listened to the oral argument in CA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
Patrick Dunn won in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
In Price v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:29 am
Mercurio v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
Third , to reiterate, the PCAOB is uniquely structured, and a judicial holding invalidating it would be uniquely limited to the PCAOB. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* The Ticketmaster v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:21 pm
US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:16 pm
The Supreme Court recently issued a decision in Metlife v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:40 pm
Co. of New York v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
When de facto, the government's conduct and comments amount to an invitation to depart upwards, EDNY Judge Irizarry reiterates in a recent decision, holding that the government breached a plea agreement by disclosing highly inflammatory information about the defendant in its sentencing memorandum to the court.Adding to a spate of recent decisions yielding divergent views of the propriety of the government's conduct in plea bargaining and sentencing (see here, here and… [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:42 pm
Quon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Vomacka's decision, reiterating his prior denial of CAT relief from before the additional hearing on the sexual orientation issue, again denied relief. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:44 am
Hage v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:14 pm
On June 19, 2008, the United States Supreme Court is its decision in Meacham v. [read post]
