Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2020, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:59 pm
In Vakharwala v Vakharwala, a Supreme Court of Georgia case came up upon appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
On June 17, 2001, Hale was driving with her child in the passenger seat and Plaintiff Jesse Branham, III ("Plaintiff") in the backseat. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:08 am
RSA 461-A:6, III states that when “determining parental rights and responsibility[ies], the court shall not apply a preference for one parent over the other because of the sex of the child [or] the … parent. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
On September 16, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in Keinz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:54 am
The case was brought by a child support specialist at the State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:56 am
He left a voice mail message stating: `Aw shit . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:28 pm
The Fourth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:03 pm
* State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
In the case of Astrue v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Bowers, 660 F.2d 527 (5th Cir. 1981) (child abuse); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
NOTICE The Florida case of Goodman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm
Breyer, who intends to retire this summer, has been an open critic of the death penalty, writing in dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:23 am
Frey (Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:45 pm
The ban had previously been upheld against challenge in Lofton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
They have one child together, a son, who has significant disabilities resulting from a rare, life-threatening genetic condition. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please follow this link: Arvins v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
