Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 5921 - 5940
of 8,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
[E. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
”AbuJihaad, 630 F.3d at 130 (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Counsel then relied on section 48(1)(e) of the Act, which corresponds to art. 5(2)(e) of the New York Convention, to suggest that Parliament clearly contemplates that not only the court of the seat of the arbitration (captured by the words “country in which the award was made”) but also the court of the country whose law governs the arbitration agreement has jurisdiction to set aside the award.Counsel then argued that the test of jurisdiction under the 1996 Act is… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
” Proposed FDC Act § 744G(f)(1) states in relevant part that “[b]y October 1, 2012, the Secretary shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice requiring each person that owns a facility as identified in [proposed FDC Act § 744G(a)(4)(A)] or a site identified in [proposed FDC Act § 744G(f)(3)] to identify each such facility or site. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:38 pm
CSC Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
It found no such evidence, stating: [B]eing "ready to resume work at full speed as well as immediately" is a strict requirement, one that is separate from the requirement that the delay or suspension be of uncertain duration. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
Last week, in Minneci v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Last week, in Minneci v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
ROLLIN F. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Again, this seems inconsistent with Wal-Mart’s instruction that “[f]requently th[e] rigorous analysis [required for class certification] will entail some overlap with the merits of the plaintiff’s underlying claim. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
The European Commission will launch a public consultation to clarify the procedures for notice-and-action procedures and the EU’s E-Commerce Directive, reports Out-law.com. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:19 am
Recordon & Recordon, 606 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
In Moeller v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
