Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5921 - 5940 of 9,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Division One of the First District rejected each of the plaintiffs’ challenges, affirming the judgments of dismissal. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
LBD11739-02-7 A. 7913 2 1 supreme court shall be increased by adding thereto a percentage thereof 2 equaling the percentage by which the salary of a judge of the United 3 States district court was increased in such twelve-month period. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:14 am by Michael Pitts
In Arizona Free Enterprise, the Court struck down Arizona’s campaign finance system as a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
First, it was a pro-defendant decision in a personal injury case. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:16 am by Kalvis Golde
The post Thursday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Long-time readers can recite the first question presented by heart: whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm by Bianca Saad
The lower district court dismissed the Kuciembas’ case in May 2021, and they appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The use of antebellum state court decisions to interpret the Second AmendmentC. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
”  17 Mile LLC had no problem with the general law as stated, just the court’s failure to recognize that the language: “all right, title and interest in the lease…” constituted an agreement to assign the right to collect past due rents to the purchaser.The 8th District Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision in favor of the sellers (the Kruzels). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Aaron, school districts simply shut down rather than comply with court orders. [read post]