Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Holder in 2013. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
In one lawsuit (Gill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
If the cost to the rights holders is £14,000 to block one website from the UK market (Arnold J, para 54), do they have to spend this amount in the other 27 Member States to block access across the Community? [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
In a third case, in Vault Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
The decision in Holder v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm
The Court issued its decision in Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
v=1226 http://a.img-dpreview.com/Articles/Files/1999431312/image7.jpg? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
That applies to all fields of IP law, in fact: patent holders will also argue that someone should just work around (or take a license if available). [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:15 am
In this article we distil critical lessons from the Federal Court’s recent decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd[1] and practical actions to be taken by Boards and executive management. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Unicolors v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:22 am
An appellate ruling earlier this month in Herbert v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
Prior to this point, s68 prohibited the unregistered exclusive licence holder from being awarded "damages or an account of profits" rather than "costs or expenses". [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:44 am
By Danielle Kays and James Nasiri Seyfarth Synopsis: In February 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Cothron v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Chick-fil-a’s Eat Mor Chikn v. [read post]
