Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 5921 - 5940
of 6,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 2:52 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:46 am
This month we've got Crowe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
The only applicable exception is (b)(iv) regarding consent. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
Marcus Richard B. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
B. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Barry P. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
B. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 2:00 am
This case came a few years before the electronic discovery juggernaut, Zubulake v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:34 am
P. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)/p>Arbitration clause unenforceable against fem attorney's claim of sex discrim/HWE/retalWalsh v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
P'ship, 198 P.3d 615 (Haw. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
In Chalk v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for trademark infringement or Lanham Act false designation and false representation. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Soc'y 335, 335 (2003) (finding a grant rate of 75%); see also Lawrence B. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
P. 52(b), which instructs parties how to preserve claims of error, applies to a forfeited claim that the government failed to meet its obligations under a plea agreement, and applies in the usual fashion. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
B. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 9:10 am
P. 52(b)’s plain-error standard for unpreserved claims of error; and held that, although the error had occurred and was obvious, Puckett had not satisfied the third prong of plain-error analysis in that he failed to demonstrate that his ultimate sentence was affected, especially since the judge had found that acceptance-of-responsibility reductions for defendants who continued to engage in criminal activity were so rare as "to be unknown. [read post]
