Search for: "State v. Self" Results 5921 - 5940 of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
 As Roberts himself noted, contradicting his terrible dissent in the Arizona electoral commission case, a number of states do allow their citizenry to seize control of the redistricting project away from self-interested party hacks. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
These and other questions are addressed by Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Insights Contributing Author, in “Workers’ Self-Reported COVID-19 Exposure and PPE Availability in Michigan During the First Year of Pandemic,” an article found in § 9 of this volume. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leaves to Appeal Granted Criminal Law: Second Degree Murder; Self-DefenceHodgson v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Johnston, 2019 ONSC 2910 J E Ferguson J granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a libel action against a self-styled anti-Muslim pundit. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The Supreme Court determined that where a time bar is self-executing—such as the two-year statute of repose in section 733.710—there is insufficient state action to implicate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "The complaint states discrete causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and fraud or misrepresentation (or, more accurately, fraudulent omission of a material fact). [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Douglas, No. 06-0581 Conviction for killing a person in connection with an attempt to steal money from ATM machines is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) being charged with an offense punishable by death entitled him to representation by two attorneys, and the district court erred in dismissing one of his two appointed attorneys after the government stated that it would not seek death penalty; 2) the government engaged in impermissible discrimination in the use of a peremptory… [read post]