Search for: "State v. Self" Results 5921 - 5940 of 15,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am by Ryan Scoville
These have generated a number of interesting debates, including, most prominently, one about the status of CIL in the United States: some contend that custom is self-executing federal common law, while others argue that it’s part of federal law only where Congress has chosen to codify it in a statute, or only where necessary to implement the separation of powers. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 11:41 am by B. Elaine Jones
Miranda rights or Miranda warnings get their name from the 1966 United States Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:46 am by Ben Vernia
* * *In this case, the United States alleged that, from 2007 to 2020, under the direction and control of its prior management, R&V Associates Ltd. and Ronald Violi, Wheeling Hospital systematically violated the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute by knowingly and willfully paying improper compensation to referring physicians that was based on the volume or value of the physicians’ referrals or was above fair market value [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In addition, as of March 1, 2020 the Self Support Reserve increased from $16,861.50, to $17,226 and the federal Poverty Level Income for a single person increased from $12,490 to $12,760. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
  But, sure enough, there's actually a decision from our state's highest court, refusing to characterize the sale of outdated merchandise as a "deceptive or misleading" business practice.In Matter of Food Parade, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Eldred was not imprisoned for the status of being an addict, which would have been unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment according to the United States Supreme Court case, Robinson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
It was apparent that, if the case of Medellin v. [read post]