Search for: "State v. Square" Results 5921 - 5940 of 6,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Finally, Rockland County stated a broader concern that the case involves issues of exceptional importance to the public because the panel excused the FAA from complying with important procedural protections under 4(f) and NEPA which has the effect of depriving 30 million people living in 31,180 square miles of five affected states from fully participating in a decision that affects the amount of noise they experience and the parks they enjoy. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Most dramatically, Glassman states: “absent fraud or illegality, the only recourse for a minority stockholder who is dissatisfied with the merger consideration is appraisal. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
"The court then continued, stating "As Verizon has demonstrated a likelihood of substantial competitive injury, it has shown that the franchise fee reports fall squarely within the ambit of Public Officers Law §87(2)(d). [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
That's why the First Amendment applies differently to schools than it does to the public square. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 12:46 am
Before siding with Nacchio’s argument, the 10th Circuit’s decision explained how Nottingham adopted the majority decision in Mooney, (United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
 Either way, it appears affordable housing or inclusionary zoning ordinances are under siege in this state (see our blog article on Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Levine" -- slated for publication in the Ohio State Law Journal:"This Article addresses the Supreme Court's recent preemption decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Holding that a state donor insemination statute must be construed to allow the former lesbian partner of a woman who conceived two children during their relationship to seek a legal determination of parental rights, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled in Shineovich v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica)   New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)   Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP)   Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak)   Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46)   Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]