Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 6,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States: Attitudes vs. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am
In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Groupe SEB USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Depending on how those proceedings turn out, we could have either (a) a Ninth Circuit opinion -- whether by three judges or by the Court en banc, it does not matter -- laying down the law for the entire Ninth Circuit on same-sex marriages, or (b) a Supreme Court decision doing the same for the entire United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
For starters, the claim that an organization can claim standing because there is a strong statistical probability that some of its members will suffer an injury from a government action has been expressly considered and rejected by the Supreme Court in prior cases, most notably Summers v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
United Tape & Finishing Co., et al., No. 21 C 3400, 2023 WL 5228178, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am
United States, 515 U.S. 177 (1995). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held, in Heck v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
