Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 13,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
Counting Justices Thomas and Alito for full overruling, that's four. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:44 am
Affirmed.Case Name: RALPH LAVERNE HUNNICUTT-CARTER v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:30 am
–Thomas EdisonThomas Edison and many of the innovators following in his footsteps have been disgruntled and discouraged by United States patent law. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:17 am
Tommie Copper IP, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 10:09 am
In Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Thomas K. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Texas 167 days 6-3 3; Roberts(m), Stevens(c), Breyer(d) Washington State Grange v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
Oral arguments were heard yesterday by the Supreme Court in the "robo-call" case, State of Indiana v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:32 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas thought that the Court should have gone further and not attempted, as did the majority, to preserve the validity of the statute as to bribery and kickback allegations. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:15 pm
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kelli Plump v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
Becerra v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas follows Ginsburg with the opinion in Bank of America N.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
In this appeal from a ruling on a petition for a writ of mandate filed shortly before the June 2008 direct primary election, we consider whether, as petitioner Thomas C. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
State, 2009 U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
The Court paid little attention to their previous decision in Thomas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
One such case, Leonard v. [read post]
