Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 9,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2013, 1:28 pm
The Appeals Court concludes, ". . .we deny the EPA's motion to dismiss and grant the League's petition for review. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:32 am
To require both levels of government to be engaged in a two-step process is, on its face, complicated and awkward. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:35 pm
That's all of us. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:32 pm
In this Scottish case the parties were aware that in Football Association Premier League v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 5:38 pm
The Circuit Court granted the motion. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:12 am
When granted, it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the publicwelfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed (Biddle v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Willingham alleged she noticed fraudulent charges made using her card totaling approximately $1,000. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
A parallel Huawei v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
In this way copyright violates one of the principal reasons that property rights are granted, to encourage the efficient use of resources. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Entm't, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:36 pm
In a recent unpublished opinion, Charles Virzi Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:16 pm
In Noble v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Its proceedings would necessarily be ex parte and in secret, and, like a FISA court, I suspect almost all of the government’s applications would be granted, because, like a FISA application, the government would be sure to present a compelling case. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
In Blount v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Is this level of gov’t surveillance new? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Wikipedia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
Instead, at this level consumers would be harmed. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
