Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 5921 - 5940 of 21,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 9:57 am by Liskow & Lewis
By Jessica Gladney The Fifth Circuit recently reversed the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in Dore Energy Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
(Michael Probst/Associated Press) Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel apparently wanted to move to the United States from Germany. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:07 am by Charles Sartain
Nevertheless, it is a good refresher on the topic. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Unlike in places such as the United States and Canada where subject matter eligibility is defined by reference to enumerated classes of subject matter, the scope of patentable subject matter in Australia is defined by reference to whether an invention is a “manner of manufacture” of the kind envisaged by s 6 of the Statute of Monopolies 1623. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Jon Sands
Here, the defendant asked to present evidence that his maternal grandfather was born in the United States, and so the defendant might have derivative citizenship. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by Larry
United States while I try to take care of meaningful client work. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Regulation is becoming an increasingly important factor for United States businesses. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am by Laura
He stated: “In my view the father’s presentation before me was sensible, honest and reliable…. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm by Peter Hirtle
It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The judge who refused Dotcom bail said he could not assess whether the United States had a strong enough case against Dotcom, nor whether he had a good defense. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am by David Kopel
United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) (Congress can use the interstate commerce power to criminalize interstate travel by people intending to engage in non-commercial extra-marital sex); Champion v. [read post]