Search for: "United States v. State of Washington" Results 5921 - 5940 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am by Florian Mueller
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  In those states or units, any and every change in voting regulations could not go into effect until cleared by either the Justice Department or a federal court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by WIMS
      However, in the case of Sierra Club v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm by kmckay
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-1164Issue: Whether the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
”  The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times encourages the Court to “show the same solicitude for free speech” in Schwarzenegger as it did in striking down the speech restriction at issue in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
United Kingdom case 804/79 John Temple Lang    17. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:20 pm by admin
”  See Letter Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy, Food and Drug Administration, to the United States District Court, Northern District of California, dated January 7, 2014. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Richard Renner
This decision applies only to those employees who work for private companies in the United States and have a right to organize a union. [read post]