Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 5921 - 5940
of 8,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:33 pm
The decision in Schnall v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am
MAC Systems, Inc., 771 N.E.2d 92, 98–99 (Ind. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:55 am
Simply put, the CCB is an untested system and the process is filled with unknown variables. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm
Board of Education and Bolling v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm
” (23) We have no special claim to assess these arguments from within the United States legal system. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
Baker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
As Justice Fish stated in Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Ontario, “In every constitutional climate, the administration of justice thrives on exposure to light — and withers under a cloud of secrecy. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:05 am
Ed Bates, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Southampton, is the author of ‘The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Oxford University Press, 2010. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Most of these states intend to enforce their abortion bans through the criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:31 am
Padilla v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 4:49 am
Rothgery v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
