Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 5941 - 5960 of 8,126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 Systems of military commissions attempted in both the November 2001 Military Order and the 2006 Military Commissions Act (“2009 Act”) were flawed, and we have worked hard on reforms—reforms spurred by all three branches of our government. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:01 pm by Barry Barnett
”  That sounds an awful lot like the plausibility standard that the United States Supreme Court created for federal Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:The immunity of foreign officials from legal proceedings in U.S. courts has drawn significant attention from scholars, advocates, and judges in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Samantar v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and  some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:32 am by SHG
  A comment that states an unsupported opinion is not an argument that demands address. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
A few months ago, a Secretary of State Branch Office "Super Center" about 4 minutes from my Office opened a video terminal that would allow me to sit in a room with my Client and conduct a License Appeal Hearing with the Livonia Hearing Officers by closed-circuit TV, which, in this case is like a crappy web cam, circa 1998. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:11 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
After the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Douglas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The immunity of foreign officials from legal proceedings in U.S. courts has drawn significant attention from scholars, advocates, and judges in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Samantar v. [read post]