Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
In Dragovich v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
A case review of an Indian tribe’s claim to aboriginal land in California. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
Stone, Hudson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
Jovel v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:08 am
Additional Resources: Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:11 am
Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:38 am
California Teachers Association, which concerns teacher unions; and Kansas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:18 am
The Court of Appeal in Zullo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 4:03 pm
The issue in the case was whether a collective bargaining agreement entered into by and between the State of California and the Professional Engineers in California Government was lawful, in its entirety, under Proposition 35. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
(California law provides that its courts may exercise jurisdiction “on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution . . . of the United States,” Cal. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:41 am
Judge in Texas of Racial Bias (Ethan Bronner/New York Times) California lawyer charged with causing almost $100K in damage to Vegas hotel suite Apple v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
Two US Courts Permit Defendants To Be Served on FacebookBring your gun, get a discount: Louisiana restaurant’s promotion sparks criticismKnow the LSUC Rules of Professional Conduct: changes are comingCRTC to Netflix: Since you won't co-operate, we'll ignore you Sun Media apologizes to Justin Trudeau California enacts strict student privacy law Ruth Bader Ginsburg: If Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
Avgiris, Comment, Huddle up: surveying the playing field on the single entity status of the National Football League in anticipation of American Needle v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:16 pm
In Alfaro v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
According to the Ninth Circuit's order, one of the defendant's arguments was that California law "only recognize[s] unconscionability as a defense to a suit by a lender, not an affirmative UCL action for restitution. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 6:10 pm
Cifuentes v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
” Estrada v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:26 pm
(Land Into Trust; Easement; Intervention) United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:37 am
Sprinkle Today the California Supreme Court granted Plaintiff Adam Hohnbaum’s petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
