Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 29,824
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rohrmoos Venture takes nothing on all of its claims against UTSW and Counter-Defendants . . . . [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
Keesee, 358 F.3d 1217, 1220 (9th Cir 2004). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:21 am
Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 186 (5th Cir. 1981). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
Zinke, 338 F. [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
., 876 F.3d 1350, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:26 am
” Instead, she argued that she was a “foreseeable plaintiff,” but the Court ruled that “[f]oreseeability, while a factor in every negligence case, is not one of the valid special duty exceptions. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:24 pm
Hallembaek, 910 F.3d 770 (4th Cir. 2018) (a case involving a defendants request to have BOP designate an Oklahoma state prison as the place of confinement for his federal sentence).) [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:12 am
Res. 549, introduced in 1992, conditioned a proposed F-15 sale on Saudi Arabia ceasing its boycott of Israel. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Retaliation: Citing Treglia v Town of Manlius, 313 F.3d 713, the Circuit Court observed that ADAretaliation claims are analyzed pursuant to the framework established for Title VII cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Retaliation: Citing Treglia v Town of Manlius, 313 F.3d 713, the Circuit Court observed that ADAretaliation claims are analyzed pursuant to the framework established for Title VII cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:50 pm
Haslam, 329 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm
Twinn, 369 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 10:49 am
” 29 USC §203(F). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 10:01 am
The courts generally don't explain just why "subject[ing] the defendants to contempt proceedings" in such cases is wrong. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
Petitioner Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif entered the United States on an F-1 student visa to study at the Florida Institute of Technology in August 2013. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
” The concurrence would have instead required that “[f]or the foregone conclusion exception to apply, the government also ‘must be able to describe with reasonable particularity’ the documents or evidence it seeks to compel. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
" The commentary advises this enhancement applies "regardless of whether the defendant knew or had reason to believe that the firearm was stolen or had an altered or obliterated serial number. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 am
Comm., 761 F.3d 346, 363 (4th Cir. 2014)). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
City of Los Angeles, 738 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc) (Watford, J.) aff’d, 135 S. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm
The court said: “We have not specifically addressed how much a defendant must know to trigger the § 2G2.2(b)(3)(F) enhancement. [read post]
