Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 5941 - 5960 of 13,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 1:18 am by CMS
The Lord Advocate submits that the fact there is a distinction does not mean that sch 6 para 1(f) does not entitle any question under reserved matters. 1449: The Lord Advocate advises the Court that consideration was given before the Reference was brought. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
His comments have been published in Proprieté Industrielle, Juillet-août 2010, p. 29. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm by cdw
” Week of March 29,  2010: : In Favor of the Accused or Condemned Holmes v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The appeal board does not side with the unlucky second party; for transfers it is first come first serve. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Among cases filed since 2000, only 29% of cases involving bankrupt companies were dismissed or voluntarily dropped, compared to 46% of cases against solvent companies. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Process claim 29 only requires component (A) to be reacted with components (B) and (C) in the presence of alcohol. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:47 am by Chris Castle
 That sentiment arguably does not exist at Google, YouTube, Facebook or any other Silicon Valley company with the notable exception of Apple. [read post]
  Using human rights in refugee law – The need to proceed with caution A well-founded fear of being persecuted is a core requirement for a finding of refugee status under the Refugee Convention.[1] Although the Refugee Convention does not define persecution and there is no universally accepted definition,[2] most definitions tend to stress the need for serious harm and link persecution in some way to a violation of human rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:32 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
So, it is undeniably article 3 of the PPA (2015) and article 18(1) of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities, which was signed on 29 June 2016 and which also requires the ratification of the UK for coming into force, which may be used to interpret article 89 of the UPCA (2013). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the state court decision in this case does not, as far as I can tell, affect whether Trump appears on the November ballot.) [read post]