Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 42,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2017, 4:12 am
The form is not a binding legal document; it is provided to JVT for information only (see D1, page 9, last two paragraphs and page 10, first two lines). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm
Voustianiouk, No. 10-4420-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:56 pm
All construction workers working for construction contractors after January 1, 2008 are presumed to be employees of the contractor by law unless they meet the specific exceptions listed in (b) and (c) below as set out in Section 10 of the new Employee Classification Act.(820 ILCS 185/10)Sec. 10. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:37 am
C.R.S. 14-10-115, and case law interpreting such, indicates that you look to a person's employment or income potential. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:15 am
On June 10, Shoigu ordered all Russian private military companies and their fighters to sign formal contracts placing them and their arms under his direct control by July 1. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Answer#10 If the L1A recipient is coming to open a new office in the U.S., the initial L1A visa will only be valid for a period of one (1) year. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court, June 10, 2019, Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:36 am
"6) There is an AMT credit, so that if one (say) has a 10% global rate in Year 1 and a 20% global rate in Year 2, one gets to offset the Year 1 minimum tax liability against one's Year 2 US regular corporate tax liability. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:00 am
Answer#10 If the L1A recipient is coming to open a new office in the U.S., the initial L1A visa will only be valid for a period of one (1) year. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Answer#10 If the L1A recipient is coming to open a new office in the U.S., the initial L1A visa will only be valid for a period of one (1) year. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
That was the issue before Arnold J. in his latest judgment considering the SPC Regulation in (1) Sandoz Limited (2) Hexal AG v (1) G.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:56 am
What If The State Does Not Recognize The Marriage? [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 9:42 am
¶ 1, Doc. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
Here is a quick overview of the docket: 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
New Jersey and New York have mini-COBRA statutes which essentially provide for application of certain continuation rights for benefits when COBRA does not apply. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
Abbott Labs, 2:07cv139 (Oct. 1, 2009)Judge: T. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
" Durruthy, 351 F.3d at 1095 n. 10. [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:06 pm
So what does a company do? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
American Atheists (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-1276 Issue(s): (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state, and located on both private and public property… [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:27 am
In its 2-1 opinion, the court ruled there were no expenditures directly tied to the prayers. [read post]
