Search for: "In re F. E." Results 5941 - 5960 of 7,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 8:14 am by Sullivan & Galleshaw, LLP
  Based on which trains had the highest crime rate per every 100,000 trips, the top nine most dangerous subway lines were: Forest Hills/71st Avenue Station (IND Queens Boulevard Line) – E, F, M, R trainMisdemeanor Sex Crimes – 0.25 per 100,000 trips 149th Street/Grand Concourse Station (IRT Jerome Avenue Line/IRT White Plains Road Line) – 2, 4, 5 trainViolent Crimes – 0.38 per 100,000 trips Cathedral Parkway/110th Street Station (IRT Broadway/7th Avenue… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 2:06 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Pursuant to section 7345(f), the $50,000 amount is adjusted for inflation each calendar year beginning after 2016. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
But, how is it possible that a Judge can order the innocent victims of a terrible massacre to re-reimburse the  large multi national Cinema operator for its legal fees in this tragic case? [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
  Despite the loss, Kraft re-launched the suit later in the year. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm by MacIsaac
  My view is that this was more related to his claim than his disability; (e)      his ability to successfully complete his education in an expeditious fashion; and (f)       his vagueness or lack of recall relating to events surrounding previous employment, his diversion, and inconsistency between the aforementioned activities and his claimed disability. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
  Applying these standards, federal courts have found that the following positions are “safety sensitive” such that random drug testing should be permitted: a) air traffic controllers; b) aircraft maintenance personnel; c) railroad safety inspectors; d) highway and motor carrier safety specialists; e) lock and dam operators; f) heavy equipment operators (e.g., forklift, tractor and crane operators). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Geist
Moreover, these programs point to the fundamental flaw in Canadian law, where Canadians are re-assured that CSE does not – legally cannot – target Canadians. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
Doss, _ F.3d __, 2011 WL 871391 (Mar. 15, 2011) (amend.), decision available here, see earlier blog on privilege issues here. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:09 am by Ronald Mann
At one point, he asserted that “[f]rom 1831 to 1976, there are 858 copyright cases awarding costs. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
Leading corporate governance scholar John Coffee observed, “Academics tend to plough and re-plough the same furrow over and over. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:43 am by SHG
You’re damn right, they are. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
(…) [16] Puisque le Tribunal retient qu’en l’espèce, au moment de la publication les propos disgracieux, ils n’étaient pas adressés à l’agent de la paix mais lancés à la volée en référence à l’agent et que ce dernier n’était pas dans l’exercice de ses fonctions bien que son intervention ait été le prétexte aux représailles du… [read post]