Search for: "Law.com"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 14,917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm
"Prominent Cruise Plaintiff Attorney" - Law.com (America Law Media). [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:51 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, addressing whether an expert report should be excluded because the expert reviewed the examination for discovery transcripts of the parties prior to authoring the report. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:00 pm
Proceedings in various jurisdictions Sometimes cases which are strongly interrelated to each other are brought before different courts. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:01 am
Adding to this site’s archives of non-pecuniary judgments for wrist injuries, reasons for judgment were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, assessing damages for a TFC tear. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:12 am
California is one among the growing number of states awarding attorney’s fees and costs for successful eminent domain plaintiffs. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:38 am
Curaçao Guide Spigt Dutch Caribbean contributed to this years edition of the PLC Practical Law Multi-Jurisdictional Guide on Corporate Governance. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:02 am
The BC Court of Appeal had an opportunity to address this issue and the short answer is yes. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:08 am
Pennsylvania is in the process of updating the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (“PICS”). [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:08 am
Pennsylvania is in the process of updating the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (“PICS”). [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:08 am
Pennsylvania is in the process of updating the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (“PICS”). [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:50 am
In reasons for judgement released this week the BC Court of Appeal discussed physician patient confidentiality and the limited basis for disrupting this. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:41 am
Last week, John Steele linked to a Law.com article about D. [read post]
27 May 2013, 8:50 am
Reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Nanaimo Registry, addressing the adequacy of a warning sign in an occupier’s liability lawsuit. [read post]
25 May 2013, 11:16 am
Law.com has an interesting story about a corporate GC who audits the technical competencies of lawyers at outside law firms -- and finds the skill set lacking (and hence expensive to the client). [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:30 am
In reinstating a successful damages award, the Supreme Court of Canada had the opportunity to discuss if and when it is ok for a trial judge to copy a lawyer’s submissions in their reasons for judgement. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:15 am
This week the BC Court of Appeal provided reasons explaining that it is not appropriate for a judge or jury to reduce damages for diminished earning capacity when there is a possibility the Plaintiff will be incarcerated in the future. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:15 am
This week the BC Court of Appeal provided reasons explaining that it is not appropriate for a judge or jury to reduce damages for diminished earning capacity when there is a possibility the Plaintiff will be incarcerated in the future. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:14 am
— from Internet Cases Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft — from Law.com SMBs embrace BYOD, but slow to manage mobile devices — from ZDNet Act On Clarifying Ownership of Work-Related Social Media Accounts Before You Become “Dinner” — from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Sitting on Big Data: The Evolution of the Mobile Workplace — from Innovation InsightsHR & Employee Relations Do You Know the Seven Factors… [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:00 pm
Duty to submit exhibits It can of course happen that it is not a plaintiff but the defendant or a third party who has the documents by which the plaintiff can prove the existence and extent of his claim. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:21 am
Adding to this site’s archived case summaries of collisions invovling jaywalking pedestrians, two separate cases involving such a collision recently were dismissed at trial by the BC Supreme Court. [read post]
