Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 29,825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 8:52 am
McGucken v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
And on Wednesday, I will share seven modules for an upper-level First Amendment Class (Speech and Religion). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 3:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
Brandt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At the federal level, the House Committee on Transportation stated long haul GHG emissions accounts for 24 percent of total GHG emissions and a plan to decarbonize this industry supports statewide RPS planning as well as reduces nationwide climate concerns. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Safe Harbor Framework, which the European Commission had previously determined to provide an adequate level of data protection. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
They should get at least the level of careful review and negotiation that the DMCA did back in 1998: a lot of meetings, among a lot of stakeholders, putting in enough time to truly hash out questions of operational detail for those harmed by online content, users accused of breaking the law, and platforms. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
They may choose lower levels of immigration to preserve this attribute. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm
These additional relief provisions relate to former employees rejecting offers of employment, the inability to fill positions with new employees, and the inability to restore business operations to February 15 levels as a result of governmental actions (such as shut down orders). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
That complaint was rejected on the ground, inter alia, that, in Decision 2000/520 (‘the Safe Harbour Decision’), the Commission had found that the United States ensured an adequate level of protection. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:47 am
In R v Kal Tire, 2020 ABCA 200 (CanLII), the Alberta Court of Appeal clarified the law on an employer’s defence of due diligence when charged with an occupational health and safety violation. [read post]
