Search for: "Little v State"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 26,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
The new case is Walker v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 6:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am
Kerry and NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Vekic v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
In 1997, the United States Courts of Appeals, Second Circuit, stated in Francis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Cavazos v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
In Gideon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:45 pm
In Riegel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
The issue at the heart of King v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court quietly vacated a $7.7 million award in a wage-hour class action in Chinese Daily News v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
According to the recent testimony of former State Farm employee Robert Butler in the case of Armisted v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:11 am
Instead of resolving the merits, the Court asked the parties to work out a resolution, but then in the subsequent case, Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Bohling and then reinforced in 2004 in State v. [read post]
