Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 5941 - 5960 of 6,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:27 pm
" The new law will require the Attorney General to adopt minimization procedures consistent with FISA section 101(h). [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
" (h/t to BizCult) The article very nicely sets out some of the key things (beyond labor and real estate costs) to look at in determining where to locate your business. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that "[t]he hearsay statements of the complainants were sufficiently probative to constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:17 am
One thing seems to be sure: We won’t find him floating under the Bear Mountain Bridge. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:12 pm
One thing I wanted to talk about briefly, Rick, was the precursor to the marriage definition which was the decision of the case in M&H, and that's where the Court said "you can't give rights to opposite sex common-law spouses that you don't also give to same-sex common-law spouses". [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:02 am
Society was changing, but it hadn't changed nearly enough. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:47 am
H/T to the WSJ Law Blog.The details of this case really don't matter. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
And even though he can't be there himself, Dominic Jones is helping collect Web 2.0 thoughts from conference attendees as it happens. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
According to most officers, the HGN test is the most valid of the three field tests (HGN, Walk and Turn, and One Leg Stand) because they usually say, "the eyes don't lie" meaning if you eyes jerk during the test (nystagmus is an involuntary jerking of the eyes) then you are intoxicated. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:30 am
That's all the court's opinion says on the subject, so we don't know whether, in fact, McCully's follow-up lawsuit effectively sought a double recovery, or whether his experts in the appraisal proceeding omitted the 2001 tax dividend in their valuation. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
That question is "the key to the whole case," said Supreme Court Justice Edward H. [read post]