Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 18,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:01 am
The Examining Attorney maintained that the goods in that registration (coffee, tea, chocolates, blinis, cakes, candy, caramels, mustard, vinegar, horseradish) were not sufficiently similar to the goods in the subject application to support the transfer of acquired distinctiveness.Applicant submitted 13 registrations covering cosmetics/soaps and at least some of the goods identified in the prior registration, as well as webpages from Crabtree & Evelyn showing that mark used on… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
Carpenter also leaves some obvious question marks: What about short-term historical CSLI? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 2:25 pm
Another good daily update source, broader than just legal, is Mark T. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
Furthermore, €70,000 is not enough to cover the damages as Wycon did not only save money to essentially refurbish their stores in style but also the sums to set up each shop. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm
Amy Howe cover the ruling for this blog; her coverage first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:06 pm
Here, the Board observed that both parties had beer and/or wine in the goods covered by its registrations. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
Today's opinion of the Court holds:We decline to extend Smith and Miller [the third-party cases] to cover these novel circumstances. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Mark Anderson, Respondents. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:35 am
Still, it seems like it might be useful for the judge, in crafting the injunction, to know why the jury felt the marks were so similar as to create customer confusion. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
Amy Lee Rosen covers the decision for Law360 (subscription required).Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of today’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
UK law provides specifically that these injunctions should be available where a website is infringing copyright, but has no equivalent for trade marks. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
All relevant fields should be completed, but fields marked with a red asterisk must to be completed. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
As Mark Leon Goldberg wrote for the U.N. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm
In their brief, the States assert that Horton wrongly petitioned the court to ignore precedent and reverse its prior position that sexual orientation discrimination is not covered by Title VII. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
“The TTABlog” covered the ruling of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that today’s Federal Circuit decision reviewed in a post titled “ZERO Not Generic for Soft Drinks, Says TTAB, In Multi-Mark Battle. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
It is necessary to consider the context in which the mark is likely to be encountered, assuming normal use of the mark in connection with the goods and services covered by the application. [read post]
