Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 5941 - 5960 of 7,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
For the next two weeks, I have added a special section on the Copenhagen Climate Talks. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:13 am by JudicialWatchWeb
Frank stated: "I want to begin by saying that I am glad to consider the legislation, but I do not think we are facing any kind of a crisis. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by admin
Over the past seven weeks, I recounted in these pages what they told us concerned them the most. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:10 am by Matt Johnston
But Congress is spending my money to buy votes of people who don't represent me for their bill that I don't support.Yeah, the heartland of immoral. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 12:23 pm by Rick
  I don’t like what you’re saying! [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:27 am
" The WSJ predicts that a Democratic Executive and Congress, including a filibuster-proof Senate, "would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:45 am by Jeff Foust
I don’t know that we’ll have a ton on this today. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:00 am by Tiffany Blofield
The "famous marks" doctrine could provide such protection. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:17 am by LindaMBeale
  Probably Congress should just quit "patching" the AMT, so that it does its work, since Congress doesn't seem to have the courage to patch the regular tax to remove the too  expensive tax cuts enacted during the Bush years. 3. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The world, however, will be watching to see whether he also signals a willingness to pressure Congress to enact the law that’s needed to make that happen. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Sincerely, Mark Schauer Member of Congress Michigan, District 7 *[Lansing State Journal, 12/9/09] [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:03 am
"With regard to this kidnapping statute, I think the legislative history of statute would be presumably that Congress thought it was important that, given the interstate reach of these kind of facilities, such as the Internet, there ought to be some power of federal law enforcement to address criminal conduct related to them," Coffin said. [read post]