Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5941 - 5960
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
On Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
by Mark A. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
by Mark A. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:38 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:11 am
The court stated that the more quickly and easily a mark is allowed, the more likely it is to be valid (i.e. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:19 am
Failure to State a Claim Survivor sufficiently pled ownership of the SURVIVOR marks and that Bickler allegedly infringed them. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
According to the logic of The Reasoning State, whatever flaw exists in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Shapiro v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
2) Current State of Law on VA Medical Opinions. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:57 pm
" He does the tiniest bit of digging and discovers that the trial counsel for defendant (Mark Stein), while no longer with the PD's office, is still a member of the Bar. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:54 am
I found the ruling on the negligence issue somewhat confusing, but the big takeaway is that his allegation of identity theft sufficiently states a claim for negligence. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 5:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
In that case, Singer Management Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
., v SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
