Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5941 - 5960
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2018, 12:24 pm
This issue was central to a 2007 case, Baker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:03 am
Detzner, United States District Judge Mark Walker, Chief Judge for the Northern District of Florida, has granted the... [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:02 am
They depend on, amongst other things, factors particular to the person tasting the product concerned, such as age, food preferences and consumption habits, as well as on the environment or context in which the product is consumed.Moreover, it is not possible in the current state of scientific development to achieve by technical means a precise and objective identification of the taste of a food product which enables it to be distinguished from the taste of other products of the same… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:44 am
In 2015 in Avneri v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:14 pm
Mark A. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
They contended that the state court’s decision is inconsistent with Caldwell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This conclusion is in fact also prompted by the following consideration: if, on the one hand, we accept that solutions like the one of the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme, ie that copyright could vest in a perfume, may not be tolerated then, on the other hand, protection could not be denied in a certain work just because it does not belong to one of the categories envisaged by a certain Member State’s list of protectable works. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:24 am
(“SMRI”) did not provide the jury with sufficient proof that its unregistered marks “Sturgis,” “Sturgis Motorcycle Rally,” and “Sturgis Rally & Races” marks were valid marks that acquired secondary meaning, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has ruled, reversing a district court’s judgment that a gift shop and three individuals willfully infringed and diluted the marks. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
IndianaUniv-v-MidAmerica-Complaint-logo [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 2:54 am
Greenfield Senior Living, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 2:02 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:27 am
State of New Mexico (10th Cir., November 8, 2018) (affirming judgment against him on his numerous claims (for disability discrimination, age discrimination, and various civil rights violations) against numerous entities and state employees) Potts v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm
Kremerman v. [read post]
In which I appear as a sideshow (but ABC gets the right result on TM/(c) claim based on news report)
9 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
Manigault v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:08 pm
See Clorox Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
