Search for: "People v Word"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 2:54 am
"Compare Lucien Piccard Watch Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm
The decision to hear Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 11:55 pm
The construction of an ecological civilization requires a global effort to improve people’s well-being while guaranteeing the future of the country. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:27 am
The reverse occurred last summer when the EU's General Court held that the word NEUSCHWANSTEIN (the name of Ludwig II's fantasy castle in Bavaria) was inherently distinctive for merchandising goods throughout the EU (and so also in Germany), despite the fact that four years earlier the Bundesgerichtshof had held that, for German people, it emphatically was not. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:30 am
But not everyone wins under the City law.The case is Cadet-Legros v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
” The classic example is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
The case is Dubin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:27 pm
This is the principal question that the Court of Appeal was asked in the case of Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:23 am
That's the headline on a May 20, 2020 WaPo article by lawprof Sanford V. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
In other words, a backdoor. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Leasing is just a fancy word for renting a car. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
A word about goodwill -- or is that "goodwill"? [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:23 am
The unfamiliarity of peoples' perceptions on sound marks is also added to by the classes of goods or services the mark is registered for. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:58 am
In Stephans v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:12 pm
A similar requirement exists in Connecticut, and it's the subject of that state's Supreme Court's decision in Morgan et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Here, though, is what the majority said in Hill v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
In other words, that’s not what copyright is for. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:40 am
Bedford v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
We have no word on their whereabouts today. [read post]
