Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 32,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (Finch et al v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Facts: This case (PACINELLI v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
Facts: This case (Ewers et al v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
Facts: This case (Cooper et al v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:58 am
Facts: This case (Klorczyk et al v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:25 pm
Facts: This case (Contreras et al v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:02 am
Facts: This case (WILLIAMS v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:21 am
Facts: This case (York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:41 am
Facts: This case (Goines v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:45 pm
Facts: This case (Munoz v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:34 am
Facts: This case (Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:58 am
Facts: This case (Disabled in Action v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 8:29 am
Internet Law: Federal Case Law: Anonymous Speech: Two female Yale law students recently brought suit in the United States District Court in Connecticut, in Doe I and Doe II v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm
According to Eisai's cert petition, The Federal Circuit's denial of vacatur is directly contrary to the line of this Court's precedents beginning with United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 7:31 am
Only minimal docket information is available to the public via the Internet.In the federal case, the copy of the Proposed Order was filed as an exhibits to a "Notice of Additional Authority" and there is no express motion or request to the federal judge presiding over the CFPB v NCSLT action for judicial notice of the order issued in the parallel state court proceeding. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Plyler v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Two gay couples in California filed suit May, 2009 in federal court in the Northern District of California challenging Proposition 8, the voter-approved ban on gay marriage in that state. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:44 am
The case is Labor Relations Division of Construction Industries of Massachusetts, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Humphrey, the rule bars state prisoners from bringing a civil rights suit "if the success of that claim would undermine the prisoner's conviction or sentence, unless that conviction or sentence has already been called into question. [read post]
