Search for: "State v House"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 28,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm
EgyptNaguib Gabriel and others v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:32 pm
The lawsuit, cited as Illinois Baptist State Association v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
” In Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 10:36 am
V. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Rather, in Wilson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:03 am
United States (1986), California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet it was just a few months ago that disgraced former film producer and Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of two of the five charges he faced in New York state court. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 3:55 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jake Charles looks at Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent “from the Supreme Court’s per curiam decision dismissing New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:04 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides…Continue reading The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The Supreme… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides… Read More »The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides… Read More »The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides…Continue reading The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The Supreme… [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
Code § 351; Jameson v. [read post]
