Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 5941 - 5960 of 14,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am by INFORRM
There is an existing precedent from the English court in this respect: the case of Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Limited. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:53 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
 More shocking for most may be the fact of how the college treated the student who refused this intrusive search of her body- with reported degradation and failing grades. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:56 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
FSCO is the government body which takes care of car accident and accident benefit fraud in Ontario. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:56 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
FSCO is the government body which takes care of car accident and accident benefit fraud in Ontario. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:24 am
United States and the 2011 case Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The admissibility of (acceptance of) such evidence in, R. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:52 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Just last year, the Florida Supreme Court reversed the 4th DCA in its Sanders v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 132639 (ED CA, Sept. 27, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed a suit by a Muslim inmate challenging unclothed visual body cavity searches of Muslim inmates during Ramadan before they were allowed to attend religious programming.In Williams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:01 pm by Robichaud
Without getting into the overwhelming complexities of why, this type of DRE evidence  is highly contentious under the present state of the law. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
   This is part of the Cancer Moonshot program launched by President Barack Obama at his last State of the Union Address. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
End of Life Choices New York and the End of Life Liberty Project are applauding the ruling by the New York Court of Appeals to hear the appeal in the case of Myers, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by INFORRM
In reaching his conclusion, Mr Justice Warby made clear that the central dispute was not whether the publications concerned matters of public interest (because alleged misconduct by a public body clearly is), but rather whether Mr de Freitas “reasonably believed that publication of the particular statement was in the public interest“. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:00 pm by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, by placing his body in front of the van, he could have injured himself and caused substantial disruption. [read post]