Search for: "State v. Browning"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 8,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
Most important however was his stand on Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court, in Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:24 am
Plata is a Net Benefit to Public Safety and Our Constitutional Rights Inimai Chettiar of the ACLU weighs in on the importance of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 12:02 pm
Brown, 96 NY2d 80). [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:10 am
In Chattman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
The reason for the introduction of this legislation comes after a 2011 Supreme Court case, Pilva v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Such modernizations exploded dramatically following the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:04 am
Granite State Ins. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:20 am
The table of contents is as follows: Herbert Lovelace, King Making: Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:00 am
In the spring of 1954, prior to his decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
(yawn).Corley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
The reason for the introduction of this legislation comes after a 2011 Supreme Court case, Pilva v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
The case is Booth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm
This up-to-date analysis includes: A practical explanation of Section 468B settlement funds; When and how to use them; Statutory and regulatory background for designated settlement funds (DSFs) and qualified settlement funds (QSFs); Discussion of the Tenth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
The ruling in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:21 am
Aug. 22, 2014) (denying motion to reconsider); Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
Brown, 2022 SCC 18, released concurrently, concludes that s. 33.1 violates the Charter and is of no force or effect pursuant to s. 52(1). [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
Finally, in his closing statement, the prosecutor made several "irrelevant comments which [had] no bearing on any legitimate issue in the case" (People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109) and, in stating that "[p]rosecutors seek justice and juries deliver it in cases such as these," he "exceed[ed] the bounds of legitimate advocacy" (People v Melendez, 11 AD3d 983, 984, lv denied 4 NY3d 888; see People v Benedetto, 294 AD2d 958, 959). [read post]
